Matter of Folkes v. Hushion
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
A position is not effectively abolished where a person not appointed in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Service Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 7) is employed to perform the duties formerly performed by the holder of the position. The holder of such a position who has been suspended because no appropriation has been made for the payment of the salary attached to the position, is entitled to reinstatement in the same or similar position, at least from the date where, it appears, his salary can be paid, without requiring an appropriation of additional moneys. Proof of the existence since…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Wipfler v. KlebesNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- McCanless v. BrieantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Smith v. Mac MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Brayer v. LappleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Buffalo Police Benevolent Ass'n v. MakowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.