Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Hall
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 6, 2002No. 1010573Published
1Opinion of the Court
844 So.2d 571 (2002)
Ex parte Tarus HALL.
(In re State of Alabama v. Tarus Hall).
1010573.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
September 6, 2002.
Barry E. Teague, Montgomery, for petitioner.
William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and Melissa K. Atwood, asst. atty. gen., for respondent.
On Application for Rehearing
WOODALL, Justice.
The opinion of June 14, 2002, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor.
Tarus Hall filed this petition for a writ of mandamus or, in the alternative, a writ of habeas corpus after the Montgomery Circuit Court, without a hearing, denied his request to be released on bail. We…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sprinkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Burks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Ex Parte BynumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Sprinkle v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Holman v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.