Coon v. Nock
Illinois Supreme Court
This was an action of assumpsit, commenced in the Sangamon Circuit Court, Rice, Judge, presiding, at the June special term, by Thomas L. Nock, assignee of C. D. Loveland, the payee, on the following promissory note: “ Six months afterdate, we promise to pay to the order of C. D. Loveland, one hundred and twenty-five dollars at Havana, Ill. Value received.”
Read the full summary
This was an action of assumpsit, commenced in the Sangamon Circuit Court, Rice, Judge, presiding, at the June special term, by Thomas L. Nock, assignee of C. D. Loveland, the payee, on the following promissory note: “ Six months afterdate, we promise to pay to the order of C. D. Loveland, one hundred and twenty-five dollars at Havana, Ill. Value received.” And on the back of which said note was the following indorsement: “ For value received, I assign the within note to Thornes L. Nock, this January 17th, 1859.” The above note, together with others, were made and duly signed by Reuben Coon &…
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
This was an action of assumpsit, on three several promissory notes, executed to Loveland, and indorsed by him to the plaintiff below. The indorsements bear date before the maturity of the notes. The defendants below interposed the general issue, and a notice that on the trial, they would insist upon the defense of usury, to defeat a recovery in part. On the trial, after the notes were read in evidence, and the plaintiff had rested his case, the defendants below called Loveland the payee, who testified that the notes were indorsed -before their maturity, and without notice of any defense.…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Zimmerman v. Kearney County BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1899