Legal Opinion

Roby v. United States Department of the Navy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 16, 1996No. 95-35377PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

Twenty-one years ago in Sanger v. Seamans, 507 F.2d 814 (9th Cir.1974), we remarked on the conflicting interests at stake when a person serving in the armed forces decides that he is conscientiously opposed to war:

[W]e must bear in mind that when a person enters into a contractual commitment with the government to serve his country, it is anticipated that he will fulfill his promise. The government has properly recognized, however, that a sincere conversion to principles dictating a conscientious objection to war may occur after a commitment to military service…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1061, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1771 Scott J. Roby v. United States Department of the Navy, Secretary Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Nuclear Power Training Unit in Idaho Falls, IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API