Roberts v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Held that the cash paid for stock was its entire purchase price and that no part of the price was paid in services.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID B. ROBERTS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
Roberts v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 22483, 24527.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
19 B.T.A. 351; 1930 BTA LEXIS 2413;
March 21, 1930, Promulgated
Held that the cash paid for stock was its entire purchase price and that no part of the price was paid in services.
Charles J. Williamson, Esq., for the petitioner.
J. E. Marshall, Esq., and C. A. Ray, Esq., for the respondent.
TRAMMELL
The proceeding in Docket No. 24527 is for the redetermination of a deficiency in income tax of $2,339.77 for 1923. The only issue relates to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- American Ry. Express Co. v. StanleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Roberts v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930