Legal Opinion
Alaska Treadwell Gold Min. Co. v. Whelan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 2, 1894No. 161PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAWLEY, District Judge.
This is an action to recover damages for injuries received by the negligence of the defendant (plaintiff in error). The complaint alleges that plaintiff (defendant in error), on the 23d day of November, 1891, while in the employ of defendant as a laborer at its mine at Douglass Island, in Alaska, was severely and permanently injured by being drawn through the chute from the ore pit when the draw in the tunnel below was opened to load the cars used in conveying the ore to the mill; that this accident occurred without any negligence on his part, by the negligence of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alaska Treadwell Gold Min. Co. v. WhelanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hermann v. Port Blakely Mill Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1896
- Great Northern Ry. Co. v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1895
- Williams v. Kirby Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Bunker Hill & S. Mining & Concentrating Co. v. SchmellingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.