Legal Opinion

Mills & Exports Co. v. Fleischman

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided November 9, 1938No. 12625PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLET, District Judge.

Defendants’ motions to dismiss, to strike portions of the petition and to make more definite and certain were consolidated in one motion.

The motion to dismiss is based upon the ground that “the complaint fails to state a claim against defendants upon which relief can be granted.”

The petition is for damages for breach of a contract to purchase eight carloads of pipe fittings called “protectors” at a price of $57.50 per net ton. It is alleged that shipments were to be made upon shipping instructions to be furnished by defendant and were to be completed by February 28,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St. Louis Range Co. v. Kline-Drummond Mercantile Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Moran Bolt & Nut Manufacturing Co. v. St. Louis Car Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Brown v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Weber Motor Car Co. v. RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Apex Mining Co. v. Chicago Copper & Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. Apex Mining Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Chicago Copper and Chemical Company, a Corporation, Chicago Copper and Chemical Company, a Corporation v. Apex Mining Company, Inc., a Corporation, and Raymond L. GoveroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API