Prejean v. Maintenance Enterprises, Inc.

hi respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because in my view, the trial court’s judgment denying Murphy Oil’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment was incorrect and should be reversed.

As stated by the majority, this matter was previously before our Court on an application for supervisory writ, wherein Murphy Oil requested review of the trial court’s judgment denying its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the basis that it was the statutory employer of Mr. Prejean at the time of his accident. After we denied the writ, the Louisiana Supreme Court remanded the matter back to us for…