Flora v. Shulmister
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kinser
In this appeal, we decide the question whether a trial court abused its discretion by imposing monetary sanctions because a litigant’s counsel failed to produce an autopsy report in response to a request for production of documents. Because we conclude that the attorney, after reasonable inquiry, could have formed a reasonable belief, grounded in fact and warranted under existing law, that the report contained facts known and an opinion held by an expert and was, thus, discoverable only pursuant to Rule 4:1(b)(4), we will reverse the judgment of the circuit court awarding the sanctions.
FACTS…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oxenham v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Nedrich v. JonesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
- Tullidge v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- Natrella v. Arlington Cty. Bd. of Zoning App.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1986
- Pearl Brewing Co. v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. BenitezSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Williams & Connolly v. PeopleSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Nolte v. MT TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISES, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2012
- Switzer v. SwitzerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- McNally v. ReySupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.