Kemple v. Hilmore

This is essentially a controversy over a boundary line. The defendants in error have unquestionably a good title to the disputed tract of something less than three acres, covered by overlapping claims, and should prevail, unless plaintiff in error is entitled to defeat them by reason of claiming under a sheriff’s deed made in a partition suit, on the theory that the defendants in error were bound by the proceedings in said suit and that the descrip*811tion in such deed includes the tract in controversy. It is true that one of the defendants -in error was a party to the partition action, but the…