Legal Opinion
Lind v. Senton
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1929No. 10,700PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.
Plaintiff leased certain premises to “Metalizing Works, Inc.”
The act of incorporation of Metalizing Works, Inc., was executed before a notary public, but no other steps were taken to complete the incorporation,
The three signers of this act of incorporation, M. S. Sentón, Charles F. Helmecke and Frederick G. Veith, to some extent carried on the business which they had intended should be done by the corporation, which died “aborning.”
In doing so they made themselves liable as partners:
Provident Bank & Trust Co. vs. Saxon, 116 La. 408, 40 So. 778;
*634Louisiana National Bank vs. Henderson, 116 La.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Provident Bank & Trust Co. v. SaxonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Campbell v. J. I. Campbell Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Louisiana Nat. Bank v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
3Cited by4 opinions
- King Features Syndicate v. CourrierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Holzer Sheet Metal Works v. Reynolds MarshallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
- Wunsch v. NoelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- N. O. Public Service, Inc. v. LindLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929