Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 21, 1866PublishedCited by 2 opinions

CASE 34 — FORFEITED RECOGNIZANCE APPEAL PROM BOURBON CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 3 B. Monroe, 349; Alguire vs. Commonwealth. Section 90, Criminal Code. 3 Marring., 333 ; Canby vs. Griffin. 5 Met. (not Ky.), 380; Way vs. Wright. 2 Humph., 258; State vs. Allen. CITED— 3 Ben. Mon., 350. 44 Barbour, 118. 3 Hill, 570; The People vs. Bartlett. 8 Cowan, 297. Coke on Littleton, 206a.

Read the full summary

CASE 34 — FORFEITED RECOGNIZANCE APPEAL PROM BOURBON CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 3 B. Monroe, 349; Alguire vs. Commonwealth. Section 90, Criminal Code. 3 Marring., 333 ; Canby vs. Griffin. 5 Met. (not Ky.), 380; Way vs. Wright. 2 Humph., 258; State vs. Allen. CITED— 3 Ben. Mon., 350. 44 Barbour, 118. 3 Hill, 570; The People vs. Bartlett. 8 Cowan, 297. Coke on Littleton, 206a. CITED— 3 B. Mon., 349; Alguire vs. Commonwealth. 3 Harrington, 333; Gantry vs. Griffin. 5 Met., 380 ; Way vs. Wright.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE ROBERTSON

delivered the opinion of the court:

On a summons on a forfeited recognizance acknowledged by the appellant for the appearance of his son to answer an indictment for felony, in the Bourbon circuit court, that court rendered a judgment by default for the penalty of $500.

On a subsequent day of the same term the appellant, on reasonable grounds, verified by his oath, moved the court to set aside the judgment, and permit him to file an answer, alleging, as an excuse for the non-appearance of his son on the day fixed in the recognizance, that he “ was necessarily prevented from…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Briggs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Commonwealth v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API