Legal Opinion

Tyler v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 2003No. ED 81129PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Melvin Leroy Tyler (Movant) appeals from the denial of his Motion to Vacate Judgment, Reinstate the Case and Appoint Counsel to Amend Motion for Hearing pursuant to Rule 27.26, predecessor of Rule 29.15. Movant contends his motion was a motion to reinstate a Rule 27.26 motion on the grounds that appointed counsel failed to file an amended motion. Movant argues he suffered abandonment because counsel did not file an amended motion and that he is entitled to a hearing on the matter.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. ATS, INC. v. ListenbergerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tyler v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Tyler v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Melvin Leroy Tyler v. Chris BrewerDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025
  4. Morales v. RameyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
  5. State of Missouri v. TylerDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API