Legal Opinion
Domagalski v. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 1926PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, P. J.
The plaintiff before and at the time in question was a tailor. He occupied a shop in Niagara Falls, consisting of one room about nineteen feet square. All work was done in that room. It also contained his showcases, shelving and stock. He carried insurance upon his stock and supplies amounting to $15,000. It was carried by different companies which wrote concurrent policies.
On the night of February 14, 1922, a fire occurred in the plaintiff’s shop which caused a damage to his stock. The defendant and the other insurance companies interested declined to pay the loss claimed by the plaintiff.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claflin v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Sternfeld v. Park Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1888
- Anibal v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Furlong v. Agricultural Ins.New York Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by24 opinions
- Saks & Co. v. Continental Ins.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Deitsch Textiles, Inc. v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Happy Hank Auction Co. v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Kittner v. Eastern Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Sunbright Fashions, Inc. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.