Legal Opinion

Brockman v. Brockman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 9, 2001No. Nos. 1D00-1603, 1D00-2292 and 1D00-2813Published

1Per curiam

Appellants seek review of judgments and other orders entered in what is essentially a will contest. Appellant Brockman (Brockman) argues that the trial court committed reversible error by (1) ruling that statements allegedly made by the decedent to him were inadmissible because of the Deadman’s Statute; (2) granting ap-pellee’s motion for an involuntary dismissal made at the conclusion of his case-in-chief; (3) granting appellee’s petition for reimbursement of expenses incurred in repairing and maintaining the homestead; (4) awarding attorneys’ fees to appellee based upon a finding that there…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tillman v. BaskinSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  2. In Re Estate of BellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Maldonado v. EMSA Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API