Legal Opinion

Rath v. Network Marketing, L.C.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 6, 2006No. 4D06-3315PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

The petitioners seek a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to grant their motion for reconsideration filed after the assigned judge granted a motion to recuse in accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.160.1 Without holding a hearing to reconsider those individual rulings, the successor judge denied the petitioners’ motion for reconsideration of twelve motions ruled on by the recused judge during the year prior to his recusal. In the alternative, the petitioners seek cer-tiorari review of the successor judge’s order denying the motion for reconsideration. We hold that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Amendments to Rules of Jud. Admin.-Reorg.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moreland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Steve Ognenovic v. David J. Giannone, Inc., David J. Giannone and Richard AndersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Steve Ognenovic v. David J. Giannone, Inc., David J. Giannone and Richard AndersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API