State v. Sundling
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.
Barton L. Sundling, in petitioning this court for further review of his conviction of driving while intoxicated (DUI), third offense, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-6,196 (Reissue 1993), claims that his two prior DUI convictions prosecuted under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Cum. Supps. 1990 & 1992) cannot be used to enhance the penalty for a DUI conviction under § 60-6,196.
We hold that § 60-6,196 is a continuance and affirmation of the previous statute § 39-669.07. Convictions under § 39-669.07 can be used for the purpose of sentence enhancements under § 60-6,196.
Therefore, we affirm…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. FahlkNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SuhrNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. WishNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Dairyland Power Cooperative v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. KantarasNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Kratochvil v. Motor Club Ins. Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. DivisNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HochsteinNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.