Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Schrisler v. Winter

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1897No. 18,145PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Blackford Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

This was a proceeding in the nature of a quo warranto to oust the appellee from the office of treasurer of Hartford.City, the relator claiming the office by election. The petition was in two counts; the first claiming the office from May 10, 1896, and the second claiming it from September 7, 1896. The trial court sustained a demurrer to each count, and that ruling presents the only question for consideration.

Each count alleged that in April, 1894, the then town of Hartford City was incorporated as a city; that on the second Tuesday in May, 1894, the appellee was *178elected, with other officers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGinnis v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hedrick v. WhitehornIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walther v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Evansville Railways Co. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. American Car & Foundry Co. v. VanceIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Malott v. WestonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Morrissey v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API