Legal Opinion
McLarty v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided February 27, 1957No. 28591PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODLEY, Judge.
The conviction is for violation of Art. 1000 P.C.; the punishment, four years.
The statute, now Article 1000 P.C., is substantially the same as it appeared in the original code and reads:
“Whoever with intent to defraud shall, either by falsely reading, or falsely interpreting, any pecuniary obligation or instrument in writing, which would in any manner affect property, or by misrepresenting its contents, induce any one to sign such instrument as his act, or give assent to it in such manner as would make it his act, if not done under mistake, shall be confined in the penitentiary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Pena, Alias v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Lowry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hogan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Broadhead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Barefield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969