Legal Opinion

McLarty v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1957No. 28591PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for violation of Art. 1000 P.C.; the punishment, four years.

The statute, now Article 1000 P.C., is substantially the same as it appeared in the original code and reads:

“Whoever with intent to defraud shall, either by falsely reading, or falsely interpreting, any pecuniary obligation or instrument in writing, which would in any manner affect property, or by misrepresenting its contents, induce any one to sign such instrument as his act, or give assent to it in such manner as would make it his act, if not done under mistake, shall be confined in the penitentiary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Pena, Alias v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Lowry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hogan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Broadhead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Barefield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API