Legal Opinion

Jones v. Marmac Construction Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 15, 1913Published

Motion for the imposition of costs as a condition for a new. trial.

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

The defendant’s motion to vacate the verdict in favor of the plaintiff upon the grounds stated in section 999 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the motion having been, granted, the court directed that the order should be settled upon notice. The order having been presented for settlement, plaintiff contends that said motion -should be granted only on payment of taxable costs to him, and relies upon the case of Cohen v. Krulewitch, 77 App. Div. 126; 78 N. Y. Supp. 1044, to sustain his contention. It was there held that “ where a motion is made to set aside a verdict upon the ground that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rothenberg v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. People v. GlasgowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Waltz v. Utica & Mohawk Valley Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Cohen v. KrulewitchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. Lashaway v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API