Legal Opinion

Friedman v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 20, 1961No. Reap. Dec. 10104; Entry No. 4275, etcPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

The 16 appeals to reappraisement listed on the annexed schedule A were consolidated for purposes of trial.

The merchandise is artificial flowers, product of Japan. Plaintiff was customs broker for Lafair & Sons Co., the ultimate consignee of the merchandise. Dates of entry extend from September 21, 1955, to May 15, 1957.

There is no issue before the court as to the basis on which this merchandise should be appraised. It was appraised on the basis of export value, which plaintiff accepts as the correct basis. Nor is there an issue as to most of the components of export value. There…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. Paramount Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Meier & Frank Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API