Legal Opinion

Furness v. Williams

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1849PublishedCited by 14 opinions

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Baker against Furness, in the Adams Circuit Court, upon a promissory note. payable to one Silas Ramsey, and by him endorsed to the plaintiff, and was tried at the October term, A. D. 1847, before Purple, Judge, without the intervention of a jury. The pleadings in the cause are quite voluminous, and such parts of them only will be recited as are necessary to present the merits of the case as decided by this Court.

Read the full summary

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Baker against Furness, in the Adams Circuit Court, upon a promissory note. payable to one Silas Ramsey, and by him endorsed to the plaintiff, and was tried at the October term, A. D. 1847, before Purple, Judge, without the intervention of a jury. The pleadings in the cause are quite voluminous, and such parts of them only will be recited as are necessary to present the merits of the case as decided by this Court. The fifth and eighth pleas set up a failure of the consideration of the note declared upon, to which the plaintiff replied, and tendered…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Treat, C. J.:

This record is very voluminous, and numerous errors are assigned upon it; but on a careful examination, it is found to present but three questions for the consideration of the Court.

First. It is insisted that the Court proceeded to render final judgment for the plaintiff, without first disposing of an issue of fact formed on the fifth and eighth pleas. At an early stage of the case, the plaintiff filed a special replication to these pleas, concluding to the country, but the record fails to show that the defendant ever added a similiter. That was necessary to complete…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. H. Weston Lumber Co. v. Lacey Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Brady v. SpurckIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Eames v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Rld. v. StarkweatherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  5. Skinner v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API