Legal Opinion

Rhodes Bros. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 12, 1941No. C. D. 528PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

This action was originally heard and decided in favor of the plaintiffs (4 Cust. Ct. 248, C. D. 334). The merchandise consists of an American-made fur coat, purchased under a conditional sales contract and taken from the United States by the purchaser who ceased to make further installment payments. The fur coat was later repossessed in the foreign country by the seller thereof and returned to the United States. This court held that the return of said coat to the United States prior to the effective date of the amendment to the act of 1930 by the Customs Administrative Act of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  2. Rhodes Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. King v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  2. Protest 935128-G of PerryUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  3. Protest 935129-G of John G. Barnett Co.United States Customs Court · 1944
  4. Protest 961648-G/11390 of EscalanteUnited States Customs Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API