Legal Opinion

Mukhtar v. Castleton Service Corp.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided February 26, 1996No. IP 95-576-CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

HAMILTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Dr. Fuad A. Mukhtar worked as a physician for several years at a clinic owned by defendant Castleton Service Corporation (“CSC”). The clinic operated under the name “Doctors Immediate Med-center.” The parties’ contractual relationship ended when CSC terminated it effective October 1,1994. Dr. Mukhtar has sued CSC for violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621, et seq. (“ADEA”). Defendant CSC contends that it is not an “employer” under the ADEA and that plaintiff was not an “employee” under…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Grafon Corporation v. Elmer P. Hausermann and Marten C. HausermannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zirkle v. WinklerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API