Legal Opinion

City of Cedar Rapids v. Bechtel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 16, 1900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

'Appeal from Cedar Rapids Superior Court. — IIon. Thomas if. Giberson, Judge. Action to enforce specific performance of contract. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSkerwin, J.

This cause was tried in the superior court upon an agreed statement of facts, from which it appears that the city of Cedar Rapids has outstanding warrants to the amount of two hundred and five thousand dollars, of issue as follows: In 1894, twenty-four thousand five hundred and thirty-three dollars and twenty-eight cents; in 1895, thirty-one thousand six hundred and ninety-eight *197dollars and nineteen cents; in 1896, forty-one thousand.five hundred and sixty-nine dollars and seventy-eight cents; in 1897, thirty-seven thousand four hundred and seventy-three dollars and eig'hty-two cents; in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grant v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. French v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  3. Tuttle v. PolkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. Edmundson v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. Creston Waterworks Co. v. City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Swanson v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. In re State to Issue Bonds to Fund IndebtednessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Rowley v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Wickey v. Muscatine CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. Hubbell v. HerringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API