Legal Opinion

Loctite Corp. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1994No. 93-2511PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The issue presented is whether purchased items used to design and create a prototype that do not become a part of a package are “materials” within the meaning of the sales tax exemption for packages under R.C. 5739.02(B)(15).1 Because these items are not an essential part of the packages used to hold the product, they are not exempt from taxation.

During the relevant audit period, R.C. 5739.02(B)(15), which exempts from sales taxes a manufacturer’s purchase of packages, provided:

“(B) The tax does not apply to the following:

a * * *

“(15) Sales to persons engaged in any of the activities…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Terteling Bros. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Custom Beverage Packers, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Cole National Corp. v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs. v. Delphi Automotive Sys., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. American Watchmakers-Clockmakers Institute, Inc. v. TracyOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API