Clay v. Brittingham
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from tlie Circuit Court for Somerset County, in Equity. In October, 1867, the appellee, as guardian of Elizabeth M. Rush, by appointment of the Orphans’ Court of Somerset county, applied under sections 36 and 37, of Article 16, of the Code, to the Circuit Court for said county, in Equity, setting forth that his ward was seized in fee under the will of her grand-father, of certain real estate situated in said county, that the estate was unproductive, and that it would…
Read the full summary
Appeal from tlie Circuit Court for Somerset County, in Equity. In October, 1867, the appellee, as guardian of Elizabeth M. Rush, by appointment of the Orphans’ Court of Somerset county, applied under sections 36 and 37, of Article 16, of the Code, to the Circuit Court for said county, in Equity, setting forth that his ward was seized in fee under the will of her grand-father, of certain real estate situated in said county, that the estate was unproductive, and that it would be greatly for the advantage of his ward to have the same sold, and the proceeds invested under the direction of the…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court:
A majority of this Court thinking the order appealed from correct, affirm such order for the reasons well assigned in the opinion of the Court below.
Order affirmed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Bernard v. Equitable Guarantee & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
- Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962