Legal Opinion

Sherwood v. Saginaw

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Tuscola. (Wixson, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The plaintiffs bring trover to recover for a quantity of pine fencing lumber of the value of about $600, and under the evidence and charge of the court were permitted to recover.

It appears from the record that Joseph B. Walton, on the 28th of June, 1881, entered into a contract with defendant to construct a railroad track from East Saginaw to Sebewajng, and furnish the lumber for and fence the same for the sum of $2350 per mile. The contract contains fourteen clauses and- six paragraphs of specifications describing the work, the materials to be furnished, the manner of its construction, and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Avery v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Fort Street Union Depot Co. v. BackusMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API