Fagundes v. Central Pacific Railroad
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Placer County granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1DissentPaterson, J.
I am unable to distinguish this case from McKune v. Cal. S. R. R. Co., 66 Cal. 302, and other recent cases in which it has been held here that an employee in one department of a business like railroading or mining is not a fellow-servant of an employee in another and different department of the business. In McKune v. Cal. S. R. R. Co., 66 Cal. 302, it was held that a train-dispatcher and material-man was not a fellow-servant of an ordinary track-laborer. Mr. Justice Field in a recent case said: “ The question in all cases, therefore, is, What is essential to render the service in which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. WeaverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- McKune v. Cal. S. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1885
- Brown v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887