Legal Opinion

Earwood v. Smart

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided March 14, 2003No. 04-00-00867-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

The cause underlying this appeal involves a dispute over whether a conflict exists between two land patents issued by the State of Texas. The appellants contend that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the appel-lees on the defenses of limitations and estoppel by deed. The appellants further contend that the trial court erred in denying their motion for summary judgment because no vacancy existed between two surveys. The appellees, assert a cross-issue contending that the summary judgment could also be affirmed on the defense…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Commissioners Court of Titus County v. AganTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Greene v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Waco Bridge Company v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline, L.P. v. Justiss, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  2. Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline, L.P. v. William R. Justiss, II, Darlene E. Justiss, Thomas H. Alspaugh, and Judy Alspaugh, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API