Legal Opinion

Holst v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

We decided in the Maroulas case that after an appeal had been taken from the final decision of the State Industrial Accident Commission, it was competent to submit the controversy to a board of arbitration by agreement with the claimant. If that were the only question involved our decision in the Maroulas case would determine this case. But in our view there is a very vital difference in the two cases. The defendant has proceeded upon the theory. that the submission to arbitrators was governed by the common law of practice in such cases.

“If, after issue joined, a cause be referred, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gerdetz v. Central Oregon Irr. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Dowd v. American Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maroulas v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API