Ingenieria Y Exportacion De Tecnologia S.L. v. Freytech, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Ingeniería Y Exportación De Tec-nología S.L. (“Inexa”), the defendant below, appeals a non-final order denying its motion to quash service of process. Because we agree that service of a summons is still required even where the plaintiff purports to effectuate service on a foreign defendant under Article 10(a) of the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters (“the Hague Convention”), we reverse and remand because service of process was deficient in this case. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i) (providing that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Chabert v. BacquieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Bennett v. Christiana Bank & Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Portalp International SAS v. ZuloagaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Bevilacqua v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Curtis Sherrod II, et. al. v. Briar Bay Association, et. al.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2025
- Epstein v. BrunelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019