Legal Opinion

Swindell v. . Swindell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 14, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from O. II. Allen, J., at May Term, 1910, of Beaufort.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This action was brought to recover the possession of a horse alleged to be unlawfully detained by the defendant. The plaintiff is the administrator of F. R. Swindell and the defendant is his widow. There was evidence tending to show that F. R. Swindell had given the horse to his wife. The plaintiff contended that there had been no actual or symbolical delivery of the horse to the defendant, which was necessary to complete the gift. Gross v. Smith, 132 N. C., 604. The evidence tended to show that there had been an actual delivery of the horse to the defendant and an admission by the husband…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gross v. Smith.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fesmire v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Rosenmann v. . Belk-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Rosenmann v. Belk-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Moore v. VolastroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API