Legal Opinion

Victor B. Handal & Bro., Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 17, 1965No. C.D. 2588PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

This case is concerned with the proper rate of duty to be levied upon certain imported corduroy articles, invoiced, variously, as corduroy pillow covers or corduroy pillowcases. These items were assessed with duty at the rate of 50 per centum ad valorem as corduroy articles finished or unfinished, within the purview of paragraph 909 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It is claimed in the protest filed against the collector’s assessment of duty that said merchandise is properly dutiable at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 923 of said act,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. W. J. Byrnes & Co. of L. A. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brentwood Originals v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API