Legal Opinion

City of Fresno v. Dillon

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 12298PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The City of Fresno brought an action against Charles F. Dillon and the Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, surety upon Dillon's official bond, as Commissioner of Finance of the city, to recover license fees alleged to have been collected by Dillon and not accounted for, and the amount of certain illegal payments on municipal bonds authorized by Dillon during his term of office. Judgment was entered in favor of the city, and the defendants have appealed.

The District Court of Appeal of the First Appellate District, Division One, to which the cause was transferred for hearing and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. County of San Luis Obispo v. FarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. City of San Jose v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Commercial & Savings Bank v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peterson v. ModjeskaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  2. Peterson v. ModjeskaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  3. Peterson v. ModjeskaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API