Legal Opinion

United States v. Sorcher

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 25, 2007No. 05-CR-0799 (NG)(RLM)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GERSHON, District Judge.

Defendants Mordecai Abraham Sorcher and Sroya Sorcher face charges stemming from their alleged fraud of the National School Breakfast and Lunch Program. Defendants move to dismiss all five counts of the Second Superseding Indictment, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, on the ground that the statute of limitations has expired. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

The Second Superseding Indictment, like the original indictment, describes the federal program which defendants are charged…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Luiz Ben ZviCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Frank Grady and John JankowskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. SchartonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dobek v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API