Artem Mizgirev, et al. v. Eric Rokosky, et al.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Artem Mizgirev, et al., No. CV-26-01969-PHX-SHD (JZB) 10 Petitioners, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11 v. 12 Eric Rokosky, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 TO THE HONORABLE SHARAD H. DESAI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT 16 JUDGE: 17 Pending before the Court is Petitioner Artem Mizgirev and Olga Mizgireva 18 (“Petitioners”) “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.”1 (Doc. 1.) 19 I. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS. 20 Petitioners are subject to mandatory detention pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) by 21 the Department of Homeland…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.