Legal Opinion
Love v. Morton
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 12, 1996No. Civil Action 95-6309 (JEI)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, District Judge:
Petiti@&er Harold Love seeks a writ of habeas etopus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging feat his state court retrial, following a mistrial, violated the Double Jeopardy Clause éf the Fifth Amendment. Because petition's first trial was terminated without his consent and without manifest necessity,, the Count will grant his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
On December 5, 1995, after exhausting available State remedies, petitioner filed the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus advancing a claim based on the Double…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harold Love v. Willis Morton, Administrator-Njsp Peter Verniero, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- State v. BoganOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. GeorgesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Stevens v. Delaware Correctional CenterDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2001
- Love v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.