Legal Opinion

Sears v. Secretary of the Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 31, 1975PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The plaintiffs in each of these cases 2 raise substantially the same issues challenging various aspects of St. 1975, c. 600, which made changes in the procedures by which presidential primaries are to be conducted in the Commonwealth.

The plaintiffs contest the constitutionality of § 13 of c. 600 which amends G. L. c. 53, § 70B, to change the method by which delegates to national conventions of political parties are chosen. Under § 70B, as amended, delegates to national conventions of political parties at which presidential candidates are to be nominated are to be selected pursuant to a system…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. American Party of Texas v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Terry v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mirageas v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. Auditor of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Casasanta v. Zoning Board of Appeals of MilfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Robinson v. Secretary of AdministrationMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  5. Totten v. State Board of ElectionsIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API