Hamant v. Creamer
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
In equity. On appeal by defendant. Bill in equity, inserted in a writ of attachment, brought to remove a cloud upon the plaintiff’s title to certain land in Waldoboro. Omitting the formal parts, the plaintiff’s bill is as follows : First.
Read the full summary
In equity. On appeal by defendant. Bill in equity, inserted in a writ of attachment, brought to remove a cloud upon the plaintiff’s title to certain land in Waldoboro. Omitting the formal parts, the plaintiff’s bill is as follows : First. That he the said complainant is in possession of the following described real estate, situate in said Waldoboro and bounded northerly by laud of the heirs of the late Ossie Creamer, and land occupied by Frank A. Miller, easterly and southerly by the Medomak River, westerly by land of heirs of Lewis F. Heavener, containing forty-five acres, more or less, said…
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
Appeal by the defendant in a bill in equity, brought to remove a cloud upon the plaintiff’s title to certain real estate in Waldoboro. By the decree the plaintiff was enjoined from asserting any title to, and ordered to release to the plaintiff all his interest in two third parts of the premises. The evidence is not reported, but instead thereof the facts found by the justice who heard the case, and which, as far as material to the grounds relied upon to sustain the appeal, are as follows :
“At the October term of this court, 1903, for Lincoln County, and on the third day of November, 1903, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hunt v. LoucksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Jackson ex dem. Ten Eyck v. WalkerNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Chesebro v. BarmeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Becker v. QuiggIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Dewey v. PeelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.