Legal Opinion

State v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 3, 2000No. A00A2222PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting Brock Andrew Murphy’s motion to suppress. For the following reasons, we reverse.

In ruling on a motion to suppress, the trial court’s findings as to disputed facts are reviewed to determine whether the ruling was clearly erroneous. Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (443 SE2d 474) (1994). “[W]here the evidence is uncontroverted and no question regarding the credibility of witnesses is presented, the trial court’s application of the law to undisputed facts is subject to de novo appellate review.” Id.

In this case,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Buffington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Quick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Castleberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Edge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Register v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API