United States v. Fykes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Michael Fykes appeals the district court’s imposition of supervised release upon revocation of his former term of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). An alleged “imposition of an erroneous sentence” is reviewed for plain error. United, States v. Vieke, 348 F.3d 811, 812 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.
At the revocation hearing, Fykes admitted to the district court that he violated the terms of his supervised release by committing the crime of possession of cocaine, the misdemeanor violations of driving under the influence and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Laina J. McCracken ViekeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fykes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004