Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Lake County Board of County Commissioners

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 19, 1996No. 95-1738PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Because we conclude that appellant’s internal communications do not rise to the level necessary under Florida’s Whistle Blower’s Act, section 112.3187(5), Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), and that the Lake County personnel to whom appellant expressed his concerns are not within the scope of persons disclosure to whom is protected by section 112.3187(6), we affirm.1

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.. It also appears that the claim may be time barred, as urged on appeal by appellee, but this was not an issue raised on motion for summary judgment and accordingly cannot be the basis…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rice-Lamar v. City of Fort LauderdaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Perez Escalona v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Starks v. City of Miami GardensDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API