Legal Opinion

Bagnall v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1930No. 29,563PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Iona S. Bagnall, executrix of the estate of William H. Bagnall, deceased, brought this action against Joseph Hunt to recover damages for the death of her husband resulting from a collision of automobiles on a public highway. She recovered damages in the amount of $10,000 and the further sum of $310 for damages to the Bagnall automobile. The defendant appeals.

Road number 81, it appears, runs north and south, and there is a public road intersecting with number 81, running east for a considerable distance. Bagnall was on the east road…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fisher v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Marshall v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Ohlson v. Central Kansas Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. People v. AttemaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hill v. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Sponable v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Fisher v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Van Pelt v. Richards Paint & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Loftin v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API