Jamail v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON THE STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
PER CURIAM.*
Appellant was convicted by a jury for the offense of driving while intoxicated. Punishment was assessed at ninety days confinement in jail, probated for two years, and a fine of $1,000.00. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals reversed the conviction, holding that the trial court improperly denied the appellant’s motion to suppress the results of his blood test and the videotape recording of appellant at the police station shortly after his arrest. Jamail v. State, 713 S.W.2d 776 (Tex.App.—Houston [14 Dist.] 1986).
We granted the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lemmons v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
- Jamail v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Carl Wayne Reed v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Harold Maurice Hunter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- Harold Maurice Hunter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.