Staples & Hanford Co. v. Lord
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Appeals from the Circuit Qourt of.the United States.for the District of Massachusetts. The following are the opinions of LOWELL, Circuit Judge, in the court below: This \yas a bill in equity to restrain the infringement of letters patent No. 474,536, issued May 10, 1892, to Staples.
Read the full summary
Appeals from the Circuit Qourt of.the United States.for the District of Massachusetts. The following are the opinions of LOWELL, Circuit Judge, in the court below: This \yas a bill in equity to restrain the infringement of letters patent No. 474,536, issued May 10, 1892, to Staples. Claims 1 and 3 are in suit, viz.: “(1) The combination, with the seat-frame, of spring-supports formed of wire, with horizontal portions of approximately the measurement of the opening-of .the seat-frame and having bends in the wire to receive the springs, and end portions extending upward and laterally to rest…
1Per curiam
The court adopts the conclusions of the Circuit Court and the line of reasoning shown by the two opinions passed down by the learned judge of that court with reference to the matters brought before us on these appeals. In each case the decree will be:
The decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed, and the appellee recovers costs of áppeal.
2Cited by4 opinions
- D'Arcy v. Staples & Hanford Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
- Imperial Machine & Foundry Corp. v. American Machinery Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1921
- Coleman v. Shasta CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Houghton v. Whitin Mach. WorksDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1908