Legal Opinion

In Re Emanuel

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 30, 2009No. 14-36972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO TESTIFY BY VIDEOCONFERENCE AND FOR RELATED RELIEF

STUART M. BERNSTEIN, Chief Judge.

Kenneth Heller, a disbarred attorney seeking to recover legal fees in this case, has requested the right to testify by video teleconference at the hearing to determine his claim. Heller appears to be a fugitive from justice, and fears that if he attends the hearing, he will be arrested. For the reasons that follow, his request is denied.

BACKGROUND

Heller represented the debtor pre-petition in connection with two wrongful death actions involving her deceased…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Emanuel v. Sheridan Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re HellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In Re HensonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2003
  4. Emanuel v. Sheridan Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re EmanuelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. Heller v. Emanuel (In Re Emanuel)District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. In Re EmanuelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API