Legal Opinion

Fordson Coal Co. v. Jackson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1929No. 5154PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

After the decision of this court in 7 F.(2d) 117, the Fordson Coal. Company was substituted for George V. Turner as plaintiff in the court below. Trial was then had without further change in the pleadings. The land in dispute is within the boundary of a patent issued by the state of Virginia to Benjamin Say. The plaintiff claimed title through a sale of this grant to Turner made pursuant to a judgment rendered in proceedings instituted under sections 4076(b)-4076(k) of Kentucky Statutes known as the Forfeiture Act. The answer asserted ownership in defendant by adverse…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Burt & Brabb Lumber Co. v. SackettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Tennis Coal Co. v. SackettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Kentucky Union Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  5. Golden v. BlakemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky v. NoakesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API