Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Woefel

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1921No. 10,845Published

From St. Joseph Superior Court; Chester R. Montgomery, Judge. Action by Frances Strauss and others against Pelagia Woefel. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

Action by appellants against appellee. The first paragraph of the complaint is an ordinary complaint to quiet title. The second paragraph among other facts, alleges that one Casimir Muchlicki, husband • of appellee, conveyed the real estate in question to appellants by warranty deed, appellee not joining therein; that the title of said real estate as it appears of record is in appellee and her husband as tenants by the entireties, and that appellee is claiming title to the real estate as a tenant by the entirety, but in fact she has no interest therein, other than her inchoate interest as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Judson v. CorcoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Simmons v. OgleSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Warren v. . WilderNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Crump v. . BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API