Legal Opinion
Hidi v. State & County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 25, 1999No. 03-98-00292-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK KIDD, Justice.
Appellants Nehat Hidi and Michael Levine 1 brought suit on behalf of all similarly situated automobile insurance consumers in Texas for recovery of deductibles allegedly retained by the appellees, State and County *443Mutual Fire Insurance Company and Fireman’s Fund County Mutual Insurance Company (collectively “State and County”), in violation of article 21.79E of the Texas Insurance Code. See Act of May 27, 1991, 72d Leg., R.S., ch. 242, § 11.32, 1991 Tex. Gen. Laws 1069 (Tex. Ins.Code Ann. art. 21.79E, since recodified).2 The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Union Bankers Insurance Co. v. SheltonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Weiner v. WassonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Holmans v. Transource Polymers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fireman's Fund County Mutual Insurance Co. v. HidiTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Berry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Robert D. Berry and Andrew Dudney, Individually and on Behalf of Those Similarly Situated v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Texas Farmers Insurance Company And Mid-Century Insurance Company of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000